The ICAG Business Management & Information Systems pass rate fell from 69% in November 2023 to 63% in March 2024 — a six-point drop on a paper the Chief Examiner elsewhere describes as fair, unambiguous, and correctly weighted. Something changed on the candidates’ side, not the paper’s. A large part of the answer sits inside a single twenty-mark question: Question Four, on remedies for poor customer service and Total Quality Management.
The scoreline
In the examiner’s own words: “The overall performance of candidates was generally below expectation, and was even poorer than that which was recorded in the November 2023 examinations… We recorded a 63% pass mark, compared to the 69% pass mark recorded in November 2023, indicating a 6% drop in the pass rate. Out of the ninety-two (92) candidates who took the Paper, fifty-eight (58) of them passed.”
Part (a): remedies for poor customer service
The suggested solution lists seven concrete fixes, each worth two marks for any five points: train customer-facing staff regularly; build a customer feedback platform (suggestion boxes, online complaints); compensate genuinely wronged customers with a gift and an assurance of better service; rotate customer-facing staff between duties to broaden their understanding of customer concerns; resolve complaints quickly; recognise and reward employees who deliver excellent service; and run periodic “customer surprise” initiatives — unprompted calls or messages that show appreciation.
The examiner’s verdict: “The question was poorly answered at Part (a) by most of the candidates who obtained very disappointing marks.” Seven listable, memorisable points, worth ten marks for any five of them — and still, most candidates underperformed.
Part (b): Total Quality Management
The definition, verbatim from the marking scheme: “Total Quality Management (TQM) is a management philosophy involving all organizational members in a continual effort to improve upon quality of goods and services and achieve customer satisfaction.”
Exam Tip: Seven implementation conditions for TQM, worth two marks each for any four: top-down management commitment; properly trained and resourced employees; clear, communicated measurement factors to track progress; teamwork instituted and emphasised; management periodically communicating the programme’s successes; identifying the costs of quality and routes to improvement; and rewarding employees for their contribution.
The examiner’s comment on how this part was handled: “Some candidates refrained from answering the Part (b) of this question, but the few who answered it obtained fairly good marks.” This is the single most important line in the whole report. The marks were achievable — the candidates who tried, scored well. The loss came from candidates deciding, before they even started writing, that the question wasn’t worth attempting.
Conclusion
Management-theory topics like customer service remedies and TQM resurface across the ICAG syllabus — in Corporate Strategy, in discussions of internal control culture, in any strategic-level question about organisational performance. Treat every named framework as a two-part memory task: the one-line definition, and a numbered list of conditions or remedies you can reproduce cold. That single habit would have closed most of the gap behind this diet’s six-point pass-rate drop.
Ready to Go Deeper?
This topic — and every question like it — is covered in full inside the Passkoguru revision kit.
Join the Profs Accountancy Solutions newsletter for free weekly study tips and exam breakdowns, and ask about the encrypted pen drive textbook edition available through Profs agents nationwide.
